MARK CLATTENBURG: VAR was right to allow Middlesbrough’s controversial equaliser to stand
MARK CLATTENBURG: VAR was right to allow Middlesbrough’s controversial equaliser to stand because ref Anthony Taylor believed Duncan Watmore’s handball was accidental and the law was changed last summer
- Equaliser was allowed to stand due to change to the handball law last summer
- Duncan Watmore’s control of the ball with his hand was viewed as accidental
- And because Matt Crooks scored, and not Watmore, it was the right decision
Middlesbrough’s goal was allowed to stand because of a change to the handball law last summer.
Duncan Watmore handled the ball before finding Matt Crooks, who scored.
But the tweaked law says a goal will only be disallowed if the scorer handles the ball — not the player in possession before him.
![Duncan Watmore handled the ball in the build-up to the Middlesbrough equaliser](https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/02/04/21/53792603-0-image-a-102_1644010513342.jpg)
Duncan Watmore handled the ball in the build-up to the Middlesbrough equaliser
And in this case, that was Watmore.
Referee Anthony Taylor could have blown if he believed there had been a deliberate handball by the Boro man.
He didn’t think it was deliberate because a miscontrol by Watmore meant the ball flicked up to hit his arm, and I agree with that verdict.
It was accidental, so it was right that the goal stood.
![](https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/02/05/00/53796687-0-image-a-62_1644020016564.jpg)
Ref Anthony Taylor did not blow up as he believed it was accidental handball by Watmore
For all the latest Sports News Click Here